Friday, November 15, 2019
The Triple E Senate Of Canada :: essays research papers fc
 The Triple E Senate of Canada      Public interest in the Senate is currently stronger than it ever has  been. Nearly everyone agrees that our present Senate is unsatisfactory.  Political parties such as the New Democratic Party want the outright abolition  of the Senate while others such as the Reform Party want to elect it. Since the  Senate has not been considered an effective forum for regional representation-  which was one of the reasons for its creation-many Canadians have wondered what  reforms would allow it to perform that role better. The objectives of Senate  reform are based on one idea, that of enhancing the quality of regional  representation of politicians within national political institutions. Through  the implementation of a Triple E Senate (Equal, Effective, Elected), a federal  principle can be constructed into the national government and therefore provide  a check on the majority in the House of Commons.    A major function of second chambers is legislative review. This means  that bills coming from the other house are examined, revised and sometimes  delayed. Unless regional representation is included, the legislative review  function does not examine the purpose of proposed legislation, but instead  attempts to improve it technically. In federal systems, the legislative review  function of the Senate is only secondary to their role in providing for  representation for various parts of the country in the national legislature.  Representation is selected in favour of the smaller regions, in contrast to the  first chamber, where representation is always based on population. Therefore  the functions associated with the Senate are legislative review and the  representation of the various regions on a different basis from the lower house.         The Fathers of Confederation originally intended for the Senate to play  the legislative review role. As sir John A. MacDonald said, the Senate was to  have "the sober second thought in legislation" and should not be "a mere chamber  for registering the decrees of the Lower House". They also agreed on a  particular qualification of Senators, which was intended to help them act as a  check against the majority in the Lower House. This qualification has remained  unchanged since 1867, but its practical meaning has long been discarded.         The other major role meant for the Senate was to preserve what MacDonald  called "sectional interests". It is believed that this agreement about  representation in the Senate was the main factor that allowed the Canadian  federation to be formed. The Senate has functioned quite effectively as a  house of legislative review up to the present time, but its intended role in  regional representation has not been as effectively performed. seventy-five),  the Senate's ability to represent the regions of Canada has been weakened.  					    
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.